Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, in the midst of UAP/UFO disclosure efforts, told people “Read the Book of Enoch”. As men and women of scriptural distinction, it is obvious to us, she meant First Enoch. If the US Govt has to tell me to read my scriptures, it is probably time for me to read my scriptures, so let’s investigate this.

Nothing beats actually reading the word of God, no matter how corrupted.

(I am still working on Isaiah – we will get back to that eventually!)

This source has non-standard chapters. In other texts, this is ch. 6-16 in the standard way. But this is easier to read.
Next time, chapter 4! (more…)

Yesterday in the cool of the morning the Lovely One took me out to the back yard to cut my hair, despite her physical struggles.

It is a meditative thing, getting your  hair cut.

It was her I was meditating on.  Our courtship, early married life, children, struggles, the joys big and small, her grace in her current difficulties.

I said, “I like you.”

She said, “thanks.”

Following up on our recent post on Jeff Strong’s new marketing blitz

1. Surveys are not scientific
2. We have lots and lots of other churches that have hit a secularization trend and responded the way Strong advocates.  It didn’t work out for them.
3. Little known, but we have had secularizing moments before–trying to be more accommodating wouldn’t be the main way you would describe our successful response.
4. In fact, our society over all has had decades of generally adopting these therapeutic approaches to problems.  I struggle to think of a single success story.  Mostly the therapeutic approaches have made everything much worse.
5. Everyone is looking for a formula, for someone to tell them what to do, for the next new shiny object.
6. What we need is a demand for greatness.

When you have babies and toddlers in your life you get introduced to the world all over again.

I just saw a video of a one year old grandson watching leaves get trimmed and the sounds of the snips snipping and the sight of the leaves falling made him laugh with abandon.  He would pause to admire himself in the screen of the phone and then he would go back to cackling.

It’s pretty great that we all come from heaven and get a body and our reaction is this is so cool, I am so cool, this is so cool, I am so cool

On the sweetness of Mormon life–

You are traveling.  You stop by a little branch for the sacrament, arriving in plenty of time before the meeting starts.  You walk in.  In the one-room meetinghouse, the branch is already seated, stone quiet.  It is the most reverent, quietest prelude you have ever seen in any LDS meeting, bar none.  No prelude music even.  Just absolute contemplation.

You smile and head to the bathroom at the back of the room.

When you come out, they are singing the closing hymn.

You were off by an hour.  Your quiet prelude was the end of testimony meeting.

The branch is amused.

A thought-provoking read.  An excerpt:

Between roughly 1850 and 1920, return migration was a defining feature of transatlantic mobility. The return rate of European immigrants during this period was 25–40%. In some decades it reached 60–75% (Bandiera et al., 2013). Italians are the canonical case: between 1890 and 1920, more than half returned to Italy (Klein, 1983). This return migration was negatively selected — the poorer and less successful immigrants were the most likely to leave (Abramitzky et al., 2019). What we now remember as “successful assimilation” is partly explained by survivorship bias. America did not lift entire populations into the middle class. It retained those who were already capable of doing well and quietly shed the rest.

…

This brings us to another truth about the Ellis Islander wave of immigration that is rarely spoken: the nativists of the time were correct. Specifically, they were correct about the political impact these new arrivals would have.

Your normal best is the type of family you really are.

https://www.zazzle.com/manifest_destiny_t_shirt_photo_white_text-256859226909192821

There seems to be little buzz about the 250th, and most of what I hear of on the national level seems fractured and lame.

I have no specific plans yet but I’m looking to do something at least a little out of the ordinary.

What are you seeing out there?  What are you thinking of doing?

Three and a half years ago Gérald Caussé, at that time Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, spoke in General Conference on “Our Earthly Stewardship.” He started with a family visit to a garden in Giverny, a little town in France. “This amazing place is the result of the creative passion of one man: the great painter Claude Monet, who, for 40 years, tenderly shaped and cultivated his garden to make it his painting workspace. Monet immersed himself in nature’s splendor; then, with his paintbrush, he conveyed the impressions he felt with strokes of color and light. Over the years, he created an extraordinary collection of hundreds of paintings, directly inspired by his garden.” Later in that talk Bishop Caussé quoted Antoine de Saint-Exupéry, best known as author of The Little Prince: “When by mutation a new rose is born in a garden, all the gardeners rejoice. They isolate the rose, tend it, foster it. But there is no gardener for men.”

Listening to that talk, my mind thought: “To some are given tales of rednecks getting themselves into trouble in the desert, and to others French culture, that all may be edified and find something to draw them into lending closer attention.”

Seven years before Bishop Caussé’s Conference talk, there was another in 2015. (more…)

On the sweetness

Oh, that Danny.  Say what you will about him, tiny bowler and a one piece glove shirt is certainly a look.

• Interesting point on ‘life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness’:  yes, that is very different if you think of that as the pursuit of moral happiness, or the search for meaning.  Man’s Search for Meaning.
• The Constitution as a ‘heavenly banner’ is a much different thing than the Constitution as a set of rules and procedures
• “common principles…. that promote pluralistic societies”–the more pluralistic, the less common principles there are, by defintion.  Or the more the principles become bland generalities

But what really stood out to me was the end.

they were finishing up, at least Elder Cook thought so, but apparently President Christofferson wasn’t done, because he added one last bit.

Quoting John Adams, he said that the Constitution was made for a moral and religious people and cannot work with any other.

But we do not have a moral and religious people.  We are not going to have one any time soon.  It won’t be from missionary work–neither we nor anyone else is trying the social gambles that could result in mass conversion.  So, what now?

Posting this in advance of the religious liberty Sunday School today–I don’t know what is in it–so if I look like an idiot by afternoon so be it.  But I expect that I won’t.  I expect that it will follow the recent Church trend of laying out general principles, often in a pointed way, but with the knotty questions of application left up to us.

1.  Religious liberty is here to to stay.  No modern country, but especially not the United States, can go back to being a confessional state.
2. Religious liberty has a moral dimension.  God has allowed sects to proliferate.
3. For us–the Church–religious liberty is necessary from a purely structural standpoint.  The ability of people to check out when they want, the fact that the only people who stay are generally people who want to be there, is load-bearing.
4. A certain amount of religious competition appears to be healthy for the religions involved, up to a point.
5. The Church could have only come out in an environment of multiple competing sects and widespread freedom to be fringe–this is a point about legal religious liberty but not just a point about legal religious liberty–Joseph Smith and many others had to be in an environment where “[s]ome were contending for the Methodist faith, some for the Presbyterian, and some for the Baptist” in order to end up where they did.
6. Religious liberty in  the US and Europe was practical in origin–there were a number of settlers and groups with different Christian beliefs and organizations, plus Jews.  It was a modus vivendi.  It then became a philosophical position.  Some of that philosophy is pretty compatible with the Gospel–free agency, freedom to choose, etc.  But a lot of that philosophy is in tension with the Gospel (tension is not the same as contradiction).  Our principles of authority, prophets, the Church being the Kingdom and all other churches and religions being false to some degree, a certain degree of communal living and being intertwined with fellow Saints, strong families that indoctrinate–classical liberals in the 19th C. and liberals now were not wrong to identify us as opposed to ‘freedom’ as they understood it at least to a certain extent.
7. LDS citizens and rulers should use what they know to be good and right to inform law, policy, and the exercise. “Legislate morality.”
8. Any society has to have a certain amount of broad agreement on basic principles to be a free, high trust society.  The alternatives are low trust fragmentation or repressive authoritarian governments.  Somalia or the State.  Mogadishu or the muzzle.  Often you get both.
9. Utah being a mainly LDS state is a good thing.
10. The Saints favoring the Saints and trying to increase our power and influence as a people–and even dominance in some regions–is a good thing.
11. Religious liberty does not require utter societal indifference between religion and irreligion, nor between different religions.
12. Religious liberty does not require the mass immigration of Muslims.
13. Despite what many naive Saints think, respecting others liberties in no way guarantees your own.  Oft times it is detrimental to your own.
14. As with many things, the most interesting and hardest questions about religious liberty are not the sacred principles involved.  The most interesting and hardest questions are:

• What are the limits of religious liberty?  How to apply the principles here and now?
• Who has the power to maintain religious liberty?  Who gets to decide the application?

Many Saints would like to use ‘religious liberty’ as a mechanical mantra to avoid these hard questions.  But sacred slogans cannot substitute for seership and rules do not replace revelation.

There is a part of Isaiah that has been weighing on my mind.

Ch. 2-5 Explain the dire situation of the people, with Ch. 5 having the prophet say, I have done everything I can do! I give up!

Ch. 6-12 Begins with Isaiah’s Vision of the Divine Throne and the Lord, in the Temple, and ends (Ch. 12) with a Testimony of the Righteous Men and Women.

Ch. 13-27 The Fall/Collapse of Babylon

13-20 – Temporal Collapse
21-23 – Spiritual Collapse
24-27 – We see the world bifurcated – the wicked exist in a ruined state, where nothing is working, like they all just ran out of steam. And the righteous live in a strong city, with great blessings and glory

The situation is not merely apocalyptic. It is a collapsed society. Nobody has anything, nobody knows what to do, nothing works. This affects everyone from the top to the bottom. Every idea, philosophy and idol have been tried and found wanting. The people are out of ideas. And repentance… well, they simply are not going to think about that!

(more…)