Junior Ganymede
We endeavor to give satisfaction

Uglification and the Cult of Authenticity

October 23rd, 2017 by G.


I think authenticity is the modern day version of the Puritan doctrine of election.

Remember that Puritan Calvinists believed that only the elect could be saved and that election was a pure act of will by God.   This meant you could not achieve election by your own efforts.  But it also meant that you could not really know when you were elected.  The resulting anxiety drove a lot of Puritan behavior.

Now, our modern Puritans want to be authentic.  But how to be authentic?  If you are trying to be authentic, you aren’t authentic.

The resulting anxiety drives a lot of their behavior. (more…)

Comments (1)
Filed under: Deseret Review | Tags:
October 23rd, 2017 05:50:36

The Smells of Poverty.

October 21st, 2017 by Bookslinger

Cigarette smoke, (more…)

Comments (1)
Filed under: We transcend your bourgeois categories | No Tag
No Tag
October 21st, 2017 13:34:33

Consent is not “Consent”

October 20th, 2017 by Patrick Henry

The Sexual Revolution relies on “consent.”

Not ordinary consent, the kind where someone agrees to something.  The Sexual Revolution needs consent to be a black box. In our current ideology consent is not just a legal element that must be checked off. Consent is something mysterious and inexplicable that cannot really be queried–no one can explain it– and it is what made various heretofore illicit modes and methods of sex licit without a need for explaining *why* they should be licit. Consent is not just a precondition for licit sex, it is the thing that makes sex licit. “Consent,” in other words, is an aspect of authenticity, and the purpose of authenticity is to be opaque so it can justify a whole bunch of things while being illegible. (more…)

Comments (3)
Filed under: We transcend your bourgeois categories | No Tag
No Tag
October 20th, 2017 07:17:37

Repentance is Rest

October 19th, 2017 by G.


Hammocks - Large Original Cotton Rope Hammock on Sale

How restful repentance is. (more…)

Comments (0)
Filed under: Deseret Review | Tags:
October 19th, 2017 06:51:23

Power is not Conserved

October 18th, 2017 by Patrick Henry

Power is an everyday thing.  We all have power.

Power means the ability to cause changes according to your will.  Power is agency put into practice.

We all have power.  We use it everyday.


Comments (0)
Filed under: Deseret Review | No Tag
No Tag
October 18th, 2017 08:59:59

The Weinstein scandal

October 17th, 2017 by Vader

Perfectly summarized in a single graphic.


Comments (3)
Filed under: I can't possibly see how this could go wrong,There are monkey-boys in the facility | Tags: ,
October 17th, 2017 10:18:34

A Pentecost Story from Modern Church History

October 17th, 2017 by G.

From Brother Grant W. Bangerter.  You will want to read this.

I have in mind a special moment in Church history which has a great bearing on our testimonies and on the progress of the gospel. I hope that it has been duly recorded by those who keep the history. I refer to what happened on the 4th of April, 1974.

The story really begins on the 26th of December, 1973. President Harold B. Lee passed away suddenly on that day. His death was completely unexpected. It is necessary to remember that over a period of twenty-five years, members of the Church had awaited the time when Harold B. Lee would become the president. There had been every reason to think that this would eventually happen, due to his relative youthfulness and because he occupied a position in seniority following Joseph Fielding Smith and David O. McKay, both of whom were of advanced age. In addition, Harold B. Lee had gained more than average prominence. His leadership in the welfare and priesthood programs of the Church, his forceful nature, and his sound judgment had made him one of the apostles most listened to and one whose influence and advice were most respected. He had an evident spiritual stature which commended him to the members of the Church as one of the great men of our time. He possessed an unusual ability to relate as a personal friend to countless people. It was expected that when he became president he would preside for twenty years or more.

Suddenly he was gone!—called elsewhere after only 1 1/2 years. It was the first time since the death of the Prophet Joseph Smith when the president had died before it was time for him to die. In deep sorrow and concern the surging questions arose in the minds of the people, much as they did at the time when Joseph Smith was killed in Carthage, Illinois. “What will we do now? How can we carry on without the prophet? Our great leader has gone. Can the Church survive this emergency?”

Of course we knew that the Church would survive, but it could not possibly be the same. We had never expected Spencer W. Kimball to become the president, and we had not looked to him for the same leadership evident in the life of Harold B. Lee. We knew, of course, that he would manage somehow, until the next great leader arose, but it would not be easy for him, and things would not be the same. “O Lord,” we prayed, “please bless President Kimball. He needs all the help you can give him.” Such seemed to be the attitude in the hearts of the Latter-day Saints during those days of mourning.

We return to the 4th of April, 1974. There were gathered that morning in the Church Office Building, all of the General Authorities as well as the Regional Representatives and other leaders from around the world. We were to be instructed once again, as we had been periodically during the past seven years. On each preceding occasion Harold B. Lee had given us our direction and sounded the trump of leadership. Now he was no longer there, and we all felt his absence deeply. Again came the questions: “How can we proceed without our great leader?” “How can President Kimball fill the empty space?” And again the prayers went forth: “Please bless President Kimball.”

The moment came when President Kimball arose to address the assembled leadership. He noted that he also had never expected to occupy this position and that he missed President Lee equally with the rest of us. Then he reviewed much of the instruction which President Lee had given over the past years, and our prayers in behalf of President Kimball continued.

As he proceeded with his address, however, he had not spoken very long when a new awareness seemed suddenly to fall on the congregation. We became alert to an astonishing spiritual presence, and we realized that we were listening to something unusual, powerful, different from any of our previous meetings. It was as if, spiritually speaking, our hair began to stand on end. Our minds were suddenly vibrant and marveling at the transcendent message that was coming to our ears. With a new perceptiveness we realized that President Kimball was opening spiritual windows and beckoning to us to come and gaze with him on the plans of eternity. It was as if he were drawing back the curtains which covered the purpose of the Almighty and inviting us to view with him the destiny of the gospel and the vision of its ministry.

I doubt that any person present that day will ever forget the occasion. I, myself, have scarcely reread President Kimball’s address since, but the substance of what he said was so vividly impressed upon my mind that I could repeat most of it at this moment from memory.

The Spirit of the Lord was upon President Kimball and it proceeded from him to us as a tangible presence, which was at once both moving and shocking. He unrolled to our view a glorious vision. He told us of the ministry performed by the apostles in the day of the Savior, and how the same mission was conferred on the apostles under Joseph Smith. He demonstrated how these men had gone forth in faith and devotion and were clothed with great power, by which they had carried the gospel to the ends of the earth, reaching further, in some ways, than we with the strength of this modern church are doing at the present time. He showed us how the Church was not fully living in the faithfulness that the Lord expects of His people, and that, to a certain degree, we had settled into a spirit of complacency and satisfaction with things as they were. It was at that moment that he sounded the now famous slogan, “We must lengthen our stride.” (See Ensign, Oct. 1974, p. 5.) I doubt that everyone fully understands that directive even now. If it were put into the vernacular it would sound much more like: “Let’s get off our dime!” “Get going!” “Move!”

President Kimball bespoke other messages: “We must go to all the world.” “Every boy should go on a mission.” “Open the door to new nations.” “Send missionaries from It’s a Young Church in … Mexico, South America, Japan, Great Britain, and Europe.” (See “When the World Will Be Converted,” Ensign, Oct. 1974, pp. 2–14.) This was a new vision, disturbing and exciting, added to the old.

The thought came to me: “Imagine! At any moment the president might call any or all of us to go to distant lands or otherwise extend the preaching of the gospel.” I little realized that within six months I would be en route to Portugal for that very purpose.

President Kimball spoke under this special influence for an hour and ten minutes. It was a message totally unlike any other in my experience. I realized that it was similar to the occasion on the 8th of August, 1844, when Brigham Young spoke to the Saints in Nauvoo following the death of the Prophet Joseph. . . . [T]he occasion of April 4, 1974, is parallel.

When President Kimball concluded, President Ezra Taft Benson arose and with a voice filled with emotion, echoing the feeling of all present, said, in substance: “President Kimball, through all the years that these meetings have been held, we have never heard such an address as you have just given. Truly, there is a prophet in Israel.”

Now I affirm that since April 1974 things have indeed not been the same. This is no attempt to eulogize President Kimball into a figure greater than other presidents of the Church, but to point out the continuing spiritual power which attends the prophet of the Lord, whoever he may be.

He told this story in the Saturday afternoon session of the October 1977 General Conference.  The Church did enter a period of remarkably high growth that lasted two or three decades.

In the same session, Elder Richards quoted Paul saying that the things of God are understood by the Spirit of God, and the things of man are understood by the spirit of man.  Real scholarship must proceed through the Spirit to reach conclusions of ultimate worth.  Material expectations–ordinary mortal calculation–as in the story above, are like trying to understand a book by only reading the first half.

Other Posts from the Saturday afternoon session of the October 1977 General Conference

Comments (6)
Filed under: Deseret Review | Tags: ,
October 17th, 2017 07:30:52

Men to Match My Mountains

October 17th, 2017 by G.

In honor of Settler-American Heritage Season (from Columbus Day through Thanksgiving), I am reading Men to Match my Mountains.  I picked it up by accident, because it was right next to another book I was looking for, because I liked the cover, and because I knew the poem the title was taken from.


Men to Match My Mountains by Irving Stone | Brownsburg Public Library

It turned out to be a minor classic.  I have never heard of the book before; since picking it up two weeks ago, I’ve run across two references to it. (more…)

Comments (0)
Filed under: Deseret Review | No Tag
No Tag
October 17th, 2017 05:44:12

The sacrifice of the angels: the prodigal son as a parable of mortal incarnation

October 17th, 2017 by Bruce Charlton

God’s garden by William Arkle


I have edited the following italicised section from William Arkle’s A Geography of Consciousness pp. 123-4:


Mortal Man’s right to, and experience of, autonomy is a very destructive and dangerous process in that it is paved with ugly and inharmonious desires and ideas. If the Angelic stage of evolution was also open to this reactive phase, the result would be total destruction and collapse of the necessary field of earthly experience.

So, while we Humans make the great sacrifice of suffering and pain to achieve an autonomous and individual divine nature, so the Angels make the great sacrifice which is to create and maintain the necessary ground for our Human experience; and they clean up the mess we make in the course of this experience. This work requires them to remain always in harmony with the divine purpose and aspiration, and consequently does not properly allow them the experience of objective valuation which ultimate understanding requires.

Such is the interpretation given to the parable of the Prodigal Son. The Prodigal is the Human who is bound to sin for a reason he does not understand, but which – in the end – gives him knowledge of very great value.

But his Brother, who does not sin and who does not venture off into the wilds of poverty and hunger, does not experience the pain and misery of this hunger; and therefore does not value that which is hungered-for in quite the same way. The Brother [like the Angels] is never lost and never has cause to be rejoiced-over; for he never returns of his own accord with this priceless treasure, and his Father in Heaven never has anxiety about him.


I understand the above from the Mormon perspective that these Angels are pre-mortal spirit Children of God – whose ‘job’ includes creating and maintaining the earth and creation for incarnate mortal Men to inhabit; and where we may experience the consequences of our agency and sin; such that we may ultimately repent, return, and bring-home the precious treasures won from our suffering, and our death.

That is the sacrifice of mortals.

The premortal Men/ Angels vital role is to help mortal Men, and to ‘clean-up the mess’ created by mortal Men so that mortal life does not rapidly self-destroy and collapse. Such a job entails absolute concordance with the divine will and purpose; therefore the Angels must have limited agency and, consequently, delayed spiritual progression. They must patiently wait their turn for incarnation.

And that is the sacrifice of the Angels.

Comments (2)
Filed under: We transcend your bourgeois categories | No Tag
No Tag
October 17th, 2017 04:48:38

How Beautiful

October 16th, 2017 by John Mansfield

Isaiah 52:7. Explained by Abinadi in Mosiah ch. 15 to the priests of Noah who were too lazy to understand it. Partially repeated in Nahum 1:15. Cited by Jesus in 3rd Nephi 20:40. And Paul in Romans 10:15. Also Doctrine and Covenants 128:19.

Comments (3)
Filed under: We transcend your bourgeois categories | No Tag
No Tag
October 16th, 2017 14:18:03

Forgiveness is the Reciprocal of Repentance

October 16th, 2017 by G.

Some virtues require action or attitudes towards other people.  Maybe always, maybe sometimes.  When they do, there is usually a counterpart virtue for the person on the other end. (more…)

Comments (6)
Filed under: Deseret Review | No Tag
No Tag
October 16th, 2017 06:47:03

Chastity and Healthy Sexuality

October 13th, 2017 by G.

Comments (18)
Filed under: Birkenhead Drill,Deseret Review | Tags: ,
October 13th, 2017 05:15:46

Much to be Desired

October 12th, 2017 by Patrick Henry

For every man a patrimony, for every woman a matrimony!

-thus Sutton Coldfield

Comments (0)
Filed under: Deseret Review | Tags:
October 12th, 2017 20:02:34

You can stick a fork in the BSA.

October 12th, 2017 by Vader

Comments (11)
Filed under: I can't possibly see how this could go wrong,There are monkey-boys in the facility | No Tag
No Tag
October 12th, 2017 16:34:59

Charting Virtue

October 12th, 2017 by G.

Image result for diagramming grammar

Diagramming sentences teaches you a good deal about language.  It also makes you realize some odd things about it that you had taken for granted before.  Grammar is not the Platonic form of language.  What it is is a good tool.

The West doesn’t think much about virtue.  We do have a rich and neglected treasury of practical experience out there, and a decent amount of engineering knowledge, for those who look for it.  We also have thinkers who address first principles and meta-ethical questions.  What is the nature of the good? and so on.  What we don’t have is anything in between.  It is as if the study of biology knew evolution (along side stockbreeders who knew practical things) but had never invented anything like taxonomy.

Gallery For > Linnaeus Taxonomy

A while back I accidentally invented a sophisticated tool for investigating virtue.


Comments (11)
Filed under: Deseret Review | Tags: ,
October 12th, 2017 12:05:46